Hard To Kill or Not

Hard To Kill or Not?

A Discussion of the Hard To Kill Special Rule
and its Variations in War of the Rings

 

One of the interesting concepts introduced with the War of the Ring game system is the Hard To Kill special rule and the variations that extend from it ( Very Hard to Kill, Extremely Hard to Kill, etc. ).  This is a family of special rules that are only applied to "Monster" class models.  This includes the obvious Trolls, Ents, Ringwraiths on Fellbeasts, etc., but also some characters that are played similarly (Glorfindel, Dwarf King's Champion to name a couple).

 

On paper it sounds pretty reasonable.  Your model takes a number of hits based on his Defense.  Most (all?) of these models have  Resilience value of 2 or more so that means it takes two such "hits" to actually have the potential to do any damage.  For every accumulated strike you roll one die on a Hard To Kill table.  If the number is a 1 it does nothing.  If it's a 6 the model dies.  Anything else adds one or more Wound Counters to the model.  The next time you roll on the table, you add any Wound Counters already present to your roll so now you no longer have a chance of a 1 and you only need a 5 or better to kill.

 

So does this mean the model is really Hard To Kill?

 

In my experience, I'd say "no".  There are many ways to deal damage to a model.  Bow fire is relatively weak in War of the Ring but in large numbers it can be effective.  A Formation of Elves can be rolling 30+ dice per turn on shooting and with that many you are bound to get some 6/4 results.  In two such turns most H2K models will go down.  When you get into combat it's even worse.  A lot of the typical warriors could be hitting these models on a flat 6, or even a 5.  There are also several special rules and magic spells which deal damage at least as easily.  And all you really need is a single roll on the H2K table (basically just getting two hits in to account for the Resilience) and a lucky 6 and the model is dead.  If it's not a 6 right away you will just need a 5 or less with the second hit.

 

It is true that there are a lot of things going for the H2K models that should help protect them.  A Defense of 7 or 8 in most cases mean most models will need 6 or better to get a hit, and then the R2 means you need two such to get a roll as covered above.  Plus Monsters have a round base which means only one Company in a Formation may directly assault them while the rest are left to support.  If the monster made the charge then it probably didn't engage the Command Company so any Hero present won't be helping in many cases.  Plus most H2K models cause Terror, so there is a chance that the enemy Formation will fail and be reduced in its combat effectiveness.  Finally, Monsters strike before Infantry and Cavalry so when they do hit their damage will be applied to the enemy Formation before the number of attacking dice are calculated for the return strike.

 

I haven't played many games where I've been in control of H2K models but having been on the "receiving end" of them I will say that my experience says they often aren't worth their points in small and medium sized armies.  If you're playing over 2000 points and you can have a few in the force then it starts to get better.  But if you bring along just one Mordor Troll, for example, it's really throwing away the points in many cases.

 

To represent models that are even more potent, the game has the Very Hard To Kill (VH2K) special rule.  Here things start to get more acceptable.  This uses the same rule and table as H2K with the extra benefit that you subtract 1 from the die roll.  So you have almost no chance of loosing the model on the first roll, and can be reasonably safe for probably 3 turns of combat.  In this time most such models should be able to pay for themselves in damage dealt to an enemy force.  Many models at this level are Heroes as well, with a higher Defense and combat values, can At The Double and call Heroic Actions, all making them more potent.  They can Heroic Duel in addition giving them even more chance of overwhelming a foe.  But there is still the risk that the first penetrating hit may get a lucky 6 (natural 6 is an automatic re-roll on the table) and the follow-up die may be high enough to take them out.

 

Still, I am generally happy playing a VH2K model.  I have played both Treebeard and a Troll Chief in my armies and in each case they have proven their worth and have shown the difference a single -1 can make.

 

Going even further beyond, Dragons and some other models have the Extremely Hard to Kill ( XH2K ) rule which has a table all its own and requires even more wound accumulation before you can get a kill.  These play very well.  I went against a Balrog in a recent game and found a lot of effort was required to wear him down, as it should be for such a mighty foe.

 

And if that wasn't enough, the Mumukil have the Rediculously Hard to Kill ( RH2K ) rule and in most cases this really is.  The kill count on the Mumuk means you need to accumulate probably 8-10 rolls on the table to have a decent chance of killing it, and with R2 this means you need to get 16-20 hits through its heavy defense (another reason I love Legolas...Crippling Shot special rule to drop a model's resilience by 1 for the turn cuts in half the damage requirement).   This model really can stay on the board a long time and take the kind of damage you see in the films, though once that first wound gets through you start to get the risk of stampede and in some cases you find yourself wishing it would have died before it turned around and crashed right back through your own ranks...but that's another discussion all together.

 

So in summary, I would say H2K models are either nice fluff or potentially effective if you can bring 2-3 of them without compromising your army.  If you put serious points of leadership into one ( such as a Nazgul on Fellbeast, the Necromancer, or Glorfindel) then you need to work hard to protect it from being targeted.  Starting with the VH2K models you will find them having much better survivability on the table and can do what you expect of them in most cases before being lost.

A Study of Defense

in Strategy Battle Game and War of the Rings

Defense is one of the most critical of all the stats a unit may have in its Profile.  I would be willing to accept that there may be other stats that tie with Defense in importance, but I would be hard pressed to believe that Defense takes a backseat to any others.  Defense is what keeps your units alive on the battlefield.  When a unit dies it does not matter how great it's Fight of Strength was or how many points of Might it had.  Wounds and Fate only come into play if an enemy's attack actually gets through your Defense. If it's high enough to minimize the number of Wounds you may suffer, then the importance of those two values are minimized as well.  However, if you have a Hero with a low Defense you had better hope it has multiple Wounds available and at least a couple Fate points.

But is it always best to spend as many points as you can to maximize the Defense of your entire army?  When I first started playing I would have said "Yes".  Through experience and better understanding of some of the subtleties of the design I do not believe that is a blanket answer any more.

 

Understanding the Wound Chart

To better understand the role of Defense and properly selecting your target values for your army, we should start with a review of the Wound Chart.

NOTE:  Yeah...I'm still learning how to make charts look pretty in this editor.  I might just paste in an image of it...  :-P

 

Str
D E F E N C E
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 4 5 5 6 6 6/4 6/4 6/5 6/5 6/6
2 4 4 5 5 6 6 6/4 6/4 6/5 6/5
3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 6/4 6/4 6/5
4 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 6/4 6/4
5 3 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 6/4
6 3 3 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6
7 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 5 5 6
8 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 5 5
9 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 5
10 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4

 

There it is in all of its glory.  It looks pretty straight forward at first, but there are actually some interresting subtleties within it once you start looking at the pattern.

 

  • Generally speaking, all Wound rolls appear in pairs.  The Strength 4 ( Str4 for short ) row is the best example of seeing this pattern and therefore will be looked at as our baseline.
  • After two consecutive 6 values, a second die is needed to confirm the Wound. For Str4 to Wound a unit with a Defense 9 ( Def9 ) the player would need to roll a six, followed by another roll of at least a four.
  • A 3 is the lowest possible value to be rolled to incur a Wound. A roll of 1 or 2 (without any modifiers to apply) will always fail to wound regardless.
  • As the Strength goes down from 4, the target dice are shifted one column to the left (reducing the number of low rolls needed and increasing the number of high rolls ).
  • As the Strength goes up, the target dice are shifted one column to the right (reducing the number of high rolls needed and moving closer to the maximum number of 3's ).

The fact that target dice appear in pairs which are shifted by only one column per increase in Strength means there is not a linear progression in the protective value of Defense.  In fact, it is stepped in an manner that is both exciting and frustrating when planning an army.

For example, let us say you are building an army of Isengard's finest.  Your Uruk Hai in Heavy Armor already have a Def5 naturally.  Most Good Warriors have a Strength of 3, while Good Heroes are fairly evenly split between 3 and 4.  Your Uruk Hai's Defense already means both Warriors and Heroes will need to roll a 5 or better to Wound.  However, if you gave those Uruk's a shiield, then it will mean the Warriros will now only Wound you on a roll of 6.  This is a major jump in the value of Defense and probably well worth the extra point per Uruk.  However, for those Heroes with a Str4 it will make no difference.

Now the other part of your force are your Uruk Hai Scouts with a standard Def4.  Good Warriors ( average Str3 ) still need to roll a 5 or better to Wound you at this base Defense.  However, many Heroes and a few stronger Warriors only need to roll a 4 or better.  Giving your Scouts a shield and shifting thier Defense to a 5 may not be worth it.  Because of the stepped progression, the new Defense ( 5 ) for Uruk Hai Scouts with Shields still means that the number needed by the majority of Good Warriors (and therefore the majority of attacks against you ) did not change.  It was 5 before and it's still 5.  Even those pesky Elf Bows ( Str3 ) are no more or less a threat to your Scouts.

So, unless you are facing a fair number of Strenght 4 units there is almost no reason for Uruk Hai scouts to pend the points to boost thier Defense.  I did stress the almost, in that last sentence becuase there is one other significant advantage that a shield provides other than the stepped increment of the required Wound roll.  Any unit that has a Shield as part of thier Wargear can use the Shielding rule, allowing them to roll an extra die for determining who wins the Fight at the sacrifice of being able to strike if the win (they are taking a defensive stance behind thier shield).  But are you better off equipping a dozen Scouts with shields or saving those points and getting one or two extra models on the board?

Now the Good player does not have it quite as easy.  The average Strength of Evil Warriors (not counting Trolls and other such large monsters) is over 3.6.  In other words, there are more Evil models with a Strength of 4 than there are with a Strength of 3.  Generally, if you face an army of Moria for example, they have Str2 bows and most of their warriors are Str3.  Your threasholds are Def4 and Def6.  For general Moria Warriors ( Goblins ) there is no reason (except for Shielding ) to have a Def5.  For many Moria Heroes ( Str4 ) and the every-present Cave Troll ( Str6), that Def5 actually does provide the next step in incrementing the Wound roll.  But since most forces will only contain a limited number of these stronger opponents it needs to be weighed as to the effectiveness of spending that extra point per model.

However, when you face Isengard, most of it's common forces (the Uruk Hai) are Str4.  In this case Def5 is your thrashold. Luckily, many of the Good Warriors already have a Def5, so they are at least at the 5+ Wound level.  Now, my poor Wood Elf army is NOT in a good position here.  They generally have a base Def3 with no Wargear option for Shields or Armor.  As a result, Uruks will score a Wound on a Wood Elf 50% of the time ( 4+ ).

I could obviously go thru dozens of combos of scenarios of how to select target Defense numbers based on Army A vs. Army B, but that's not what this topic was intended for.  I just wanted to get my initial thoughts down as to the key points that an increase in Defense is not directly proportional to an increase in the minimum Wound roll, and that in some situations increasing the armor of your Army is not necessarily the best expenditure of points either because your oponent's army has such a low Strength that they already have a high roll to wound you, or they have such a high Strength that the shift of one point of Defense will not change the threashold to wound.

Likewise, realize what the Wound chart means to selecting your targets. Obviously, given the choice of two targets it is often best to select the one with the lower Defense as you have a better chance of eliminating it.  But instead of making your decisions based on the Defense number, you should try to make it based on the Wound roll.

As a recent Strategy Battle Game example, I was playing a force of Wood Elves against a horde from Mordor. There was a large variety of Orcs in the Mordor force, with Defense ranging from Def4 to Def6.  For my Elf Bows ( Str3 ) the roll to Wound a Def5 is the same for a Def4*.  So when shooting I had just as much of a chance of killing a Mordor Uruk Hai with Armor and Shield as I did the lowly Orc with a spear.  I could focus my fire on the greater threat without worry that I would miss wounding on a shot that would have killed the other target.

Subcategories